|
|
About
TODO
Blog
RSS
Old blog
Projects
Gallery
Notes
Wed, 21 May 2008
iput() locking in POHMELFS.
iput() is a very tricky call in Linux VFS,
besides the fact that it drops inode when its reference counter
reached zero, it also waits until all associated pages are
flushed to storage too.
POHMELFS uses singler per network state (network connection structure)
thread, which only reads async replies from the server, so it is possible,
that reply which requres iput() (for example create command
reply) will happend in parallel with object removal, so inode will be deleted,
but yet not freed. When reply is received and iput() called,
it will try to free inode and wait until all associated to its mapping pages
are synced. But page sync happens on reply to another command (consider for
example several writeback transactions), which can not be processed, since thread
is waiting them to be completed. This problem can not be fixed by introducing
multiple threads, since each one can be exactly in the same situation simultaneously.
In turn we should not allow to grab inode and free it in the receiving path.
This is ok for writeback transactions, since inode can not be freed until pages are synced,
so just by holding pages we are able not to lock, but object creation for empty files
or directories does not have pages attached, so they have to be synced with special
transaction. There still can be a problem with empty file though - some pages can be
attached and it can be removed while system waits for creation transaction complete,
but actually we do not need to know about that - we shuold not grab inode it all,
since transaction already contains all needed into, namely inode number, so we can lookup
inode (if it still exist) and mark it as created without need for lock-prone grab/put.
This bit took me last three days, during which POHMELFS moved to non-blocking receiving and
timeout-based sending (and returned back), it got scanning 'watchdog' which resends trasactions
if they were not acked after some time and eventually dropes them if they still does not get
a reply, POHMELFS got couple of new operations supported and likely something else to existing set
of features implemented to date (full transaction support for all operations
and data and metadata coherency protool were added for the next release).
New release is scheduled for the end of the week, and there is no readpage transaction support yet...
So, stay tuned!
/devel/fs :: Link / Comments (3)
Please solve this captcha to be allowed to post (need to reload in a minute): 82 - 98
|
Zbr wrote at 2008-05-21 22:16: