Zbr's days.

About :: TODO :: Blog :: RSS :: Old blog :: Projects :: GIT :: Gallery :: Notes

Wed, 26 Mar 2008

Additional XFS test with slightly diferent mount/mkfs options.

mkfs: -d agcount=75 -l size=64m
mount: logbufs=8,nobarrier,noatime,nodiratime,osyncisdsync

Postmark results:

postmark: xfs read/write
postmark: xfs tps

Results are slightly better than previous xfs run, although barriers are turned off, which I blame to be the main reason. Other filesystems did not turn off directory atime also.

Anyway, even with this results XFS is still much worse than any other FS (except reiserfs) for this workload.

/devel/fs :: Link / Comments ()