|
|
About
TODO
Blog
RSS
Old blog
Projects
Gallery
Notes
Sun, 30 Sep 2007
Meanwhile at appartment development side.
I've almost completed my checkroom. I coule finish it today, but
then decided that I want to make an ark for the checkroom's door,
so I did not complete walpaper glueing on the wall, where door
is located. Otherwise this very small room (even pantry) is finished.
I need to go to development shop this week to get a colour for room's walls,
special screws for arks and tubes to extend severage system (to support
shower cabin and washer), maybe I will also get new ceramic tiles to extend
(not yet even started) my bathroom coverage (I want to have a contrast
vertical curve on two opposite walls).
Bathroom is the next task of my appartment development. Since I ordered internet
setup at home (yes, likely I'm addicted), this can be quite fast, but ISP
did not yet called me about setup date.
/devel/flat :: Link / Comments (2)
Sat, 29 Sep 2007
Design of the WEAVER redundancy code module in distributed storage.
Here I will briefly describe ideas of the WEAVER implementation for DST.
First, it requires some extension for configuration (although it is possible
with existing commands to send all related information, it is a bit ugly),
so I will introduce private algorithm's command which will allow to transfer
all needed information. This will not even break backward compatibility.
Next is WEAVER implementation itself.
I will create 50% efficiency codes, which means half of each node will contain
data (first half, so that later it could be used for linear algorithm
for recovery for example, but that is quite ugly usage) and another half will contain
parity information (and optionally checksum of the whole node or data/parity checksums
separately). Reading is trivial (just like in case of usual mirroring) and will not be described
here. With such nodes layout each write to the distributed storage easily allows to find
a node where data should be written, private structure for each node will contain
a list of nodes, which parity blocks have to be updated when given node is being written to.
Each private structure will have the same per-block bitmap like mirror algo maintains, which will
track clean/dirty blocks of the data. So, when number of blocks are being written to node A,
number of parity blocks will be updated on the appropriate nodes. Parity update
is quite trivial - it requires a read of the given parity block, xor with old data block
(which will be read just before writing is performed) and xor with new data block,
then parity block has to be written back. Dirty bitmap for data and parity will be updated
after data and parity are written.
Complex part starts when number of nodes is turned off.
Let's first describe the case, when one node is turned off.
In this case things are just the same like above, but data is not written (and parity
calculated, when write happens for other nodes, linked to given one by algorithm),
so appropriate bitmap will contain not uptodate blocks.
When node is turned on, resync starts.
Just like in mirror algorithm, it will be performed only when some operation happens (which probalby
should be extended to be done even if there are no operations in-flight) - I will share as much code
as possible.
Each data block can be constructed by using some parity and data blocks from different nodes,
so instead of reading block from remote node and writing it to given one (like in mirror), system
will read number of data and parity blocks from different nodes, when they are ready, new data block
will be reconstructed and written to not-synced node. When data block is reconstructed, all nodes,
which parity depends on this block, will be updated accordingly.
For one failed node this looks quite simple, in theory multiple failed node is just the same, since
until number of failed nodes reached fault tolerance number used in algorithm calculations,
there is always number of 'good' nodes, which can be used to reconstruct at least one failed node,
with newly recovered node it is possible to reconstruct missed parity bits needed to recover another
node and so on. But that is theory, practice, I'm sure, will show me big number of surprises and complexities,
but that is exactly why I started the project.
Right now I'm thinking about userspace implementation, I hope to complete it quite soon (maybe next week),
so that kernel part would not be that hard to be done (mostly because kernel debugging is usually
much longer because of compilations and reboots). When it is ready, I will mark project as completed.
I'm not sure I will push it into the kernel at that point, I will see.
After it is ready I will likely start to recall filesystem bits I
collected and probably will
implement simple (read: initially trivial) distributed filesystem.
Or maybe not, I think this project will flush me enough, so I might start something completely
different, like process migration over the network,
Markov chains text analysis,
letter describing language for captcha solving
or network protocol over laser link
or something completely new.
Stay tuned and you will not miss interesting things :)
/devel/dst :: Link / Comments (1)
Fri, 28 Sep 2007
Mindflushing flash game for boys.
I spent two days, broke the rest of my brain, but won. Very interesting!
Spend time!
/other :: Link / Comments (2)
Stupidity.
I was asked at work to extend linux 2.6 RTC driver to support read/write
operations, so that they would read non-volatile memory (we use DS 1307) of the clock chip.
Manager said 'do it like I did in 2.4', after I completed the task, it was shown tht
it is wrong approach (there was a cmd-like interface).
After I added sysfs interface for that, management decided that it is not enough,
since they have a script, which reads/writes a byte with offset, and sysfs does not support
seek.
Existing Linux RTC subsystem does not allow to have read/write operations from
RTC device, actually read is supported, but only 4 bytes, which is not enough. So I extended
Linux 2.6 RTC driver to be able to read and write via RTC device any amount of data
with having backward compatibility with drivers, which read only 4 bytes (only one in kernel tree).
I added needed functionality (testing machine is in the next room, so I need to move there
each time I need to test a new kernel), but then hardware where I needed to show result
was found to be broken (RTC can not be initialized, although present), so right now I'm trying
to determine what the heck is with this hardware...
Crap, I have completely no time for anything other.
/devel/other :: Link / Comments (0)
Wed, 26 Sep 2007
Climbing evening.
That was really hard training - I started with simple
warming traverses and then bagan local championship boulderings.
After I was tired enough I started to climb traces on vertical walls
and negative slope. My insurance partner said that he thinks that
one should get to the next level of trace's complexity after it is possible
to complete 10 traces on the current lavel (i.e. my highest trace is 7a, so
I should be able to complete 10 6c traces during training). Since I can not complete
10 different 6c traces (there are not so many traces of such complexity at the climbing
zone and I only tried couple of them), I decided to finish several 6b - I managed
to finish only 4 traces and then my partner moved home, so I switched back to
boulderings.
That was really hard time but damn very good.
/life :: Link / Comments (0)
Tue, 25 Sep 2007
New release of the userspace network stack.
You think I forgot it? No.
Many thanks to Salvatore Del Popolo for kicking me with bugs.
This release contains number of bug fixes and ability to be used with packet sockets
instead of netchannels.
And extended README with bits of documentation and examples.
New release is available at project's homepage.
/devel/networking :: Link / Comments (0)
WEAVER redundancy code.
I've started initial userspace implmentation of the
WEAVER codes.
This is very simple XOR-based code and thus it is possible
to miss the double bit error, so I will extend it with strong
checksum. Essentially system splits the whole pool
of available nodes (storages) into so called strips,
which contains number of data and parity blocks (I will use sector-sized chunks).
The latter is just a XOR of some data blocks, each data block which
participate in given parity block is defined by parity defining sets of WEAVER
code, which depends on selected number of fault tolerance, number of nodes used
and selected step.
So far I plan to implement simple case for 3 fault tolerance (i.e. any 3 nodes
can be turned off) in userspace in the way which will allow to construct
storages with different fault tolerance number.
Stay tuned.
/devel/dst :: Link / Comments (0)
Mon, 24 Sep 2007
Climbing evening.
It is quite hard to call this training as climbing one,
since most of the time I talked with Grange
about recent happenings and discussed some future plans.
But nevertheless I climbed number of complex boulderings
(since Grange as usual was late) from the last local championship
and some warming traverses, I even completed one quite new complex traces on the vertical
wall.
That was good time.
/life :: Link / Comments (0)
Sun, 23 Sep 2007
Windows DST target.
There is a port of userspace DST target to windows, which
works with usual files (work with device nodes is in TODO list) in userspace,
so I've started a stress testing utility implementation,
which will randomly read and write blocks over the net. After
this testing is completed I will test this utility with real
DST system and put on the homepage.
Windows DST target was not written by me.
/devel/dst :: Link / Comments (0)
I've found what to do with presented by Oracle notebook.
I will draw small pictures in that red book, i.e. all I will see
and have a time or interest to draw. Since I actually do not know
and just can not draw something interesting, I will create small
sized pictures. Maybe I will put something, which I think is good enough,
from those drawings here.
/life :: Link / Comments (0)
Fri, 21 Sep 2007
Climbing evening.
That was interesting training, since almost every part
of my body was aching after previous training, but nevertheless
I managed to complete a lot of traces - from simple warming traverses and
couple of trivial new traces upto quite complex old and new
traces on verticall wall and negative wall.
Since Grange is slacking his ass
at office (likely studying articles about distributed systems and search
engines :-), I climb with local people, but since I almost do not know
them, quite a lot of fun disappears.
Anyway, that was really good time there, I think I'm getting my old shape back...
/life :: Link / Comments (0)
Linux Kernel Summit group photo.
Click on photo to get full annotated version from LWN.

You will not find me there - I made photos on second camera with Michael Kerrisk.
/devel/other :: Link / Comments (0)
Wed, 19 Sep 2007
Climbing evening.
It was quite long ago (about three weeks) I climbed,
so this training was really hard. There are many new traces: from simple
to damn complex, so I tried number of them and managed to complete
all tried ones (although not always without fall). Usual warming traverses,
couple of boulderings and new starts at the begining of the training
forced me into quite good shape, so the rest of the training
was quite productive.
That was excellent time there.
/life :: Link / Comments (0)
Tue, 18 Sep 2007
New article about distributed storage on kerneltrap.
Article
describes a short debate about place of the DST in the storage stack, its relation
to filesystem and various ideas of creating distributed systems, which I had with
Jeff Garzik (SATA and network drivers maintainer), Andreas Dilger (Lustre/Clusterfs
principal software engineer) and other people.
There were two points of view - all existing distributed systems suck (too overbloated,
too oriented to very expensive storage hardware, badly scaled and so on) and
that existing (Lustre) is very good, so no need to reinvent the wheel, since
distributed FS is quite complex, and likely will not succeed, but block device
is simple and thus appealing.
Maybe it is right, we will see...
/devel/dst :: Link / Comments (4)
Mon, 17 Sep 2007
SWsoft wants me to work with them.
And they want me to work on my own projects without serious
influence on todo list, but for the price of using openvz.org e-mail
and working one quarter of my time on theirs kernel projects.
Looks quite attractive, although they are not interested in my non-kernel
projects.
/devel/other :: Link / Comments (5)
Sat, 15 Sep 2007
Gogol bar.
Today I visited bar 'Gogol' in Stoleshnikov lane with WiJo (Evgeniy), Shurochka
her sister Tatyana. We listened live ska band called "Pakava It'",
I mostly saw how trumpet was used and found that I still do not know something serious,
since my sounds are awful.
That was really great and fun time with good (although a bit loud) music.
/life :: Link / Comments (1)
Fri, 14 Sep 2007
New release of the distributed storage subsystem.
It only includes new configuration interface (connector over netlink socket)
and fixes for number of bugs found during that move (in error path).
Enjoy.
/devel/dst :: Link / Comments (4)
Thu, 13 Sep 2007
London photos.
I've just added set of my London photos
and several Cambridge photos to the gallery.
Please note, that I made all London photos without any automatic,
since my camera is broken, so I needed to perform focus, aperture and exposure
by hands, which sometimes resulted in bad quality. But actually I liked that process,
since quite frequently it ended up with pictures I really wanted to see, but automatic was
not able to detect my intentions. Unfortunately I did not get my tripod, otherwise
I did not move from there that fast :)
Anyway, enjoy!
And here are my new books I brought from London:

"Engineering a compiler" by Keith D. Cooper and Linda Torczon.
"The road to reality. A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe" by Roger Penrose.
"Introduction to drawing" and "How to draw head and body of the human". Yes, I will try to
learn, but I think I'm pretty hopeless :)
I think I would like to stay in London for longer (a year or so), but have no plans right now.
I want to greatly thank Tanya, Andrey, Ira and Meph for the excellent time I spent with them there.
That was really great!
I hope I will quickly resolve my paid job issues and will visit you again :)
/life :: Link / Comments (0)
Distributed storage testing.
Patch sent to linux-kernel@ and in archive is a bit broken, since
it does not even compile (I messed with commits again), and I got
no response about it.
Paul McKenney provided RCU review of the patchset and found it generally ok,
although with couple questionable moments. RCU is not used in DST actually,
so everything is good.
I will release new version soon (hopefully this week), which will include
simple parts of the DST short-term todo list:
- move from ioctl/char device to netlink based setup
- store linear/mirror information at the end of the appropriate node's storage
to allow extended autoconfiguration (if this will require a bit more
work, then likely I will not put it to the next release)
Long term todo list includes:
- WEAVER codes implementation (I fully understand it now, but will extend
original design to store checksums of the data to catch double switched bits,
which can lead to data corruption for XOR based codes).
First in userspace.
- start thinking about distributed filesystem (simple first steps) over distributed
storage. I know, there is number of them, but I want my own, which will be tightly
collaborated with underlying device for maximum performance and reliability.
After Sun's announcement
about buying ClusetFS (Lustre) I think about it more and more.
/devel/dst :: Link / Comments (0)
Sun, 09 Sep 2007
London does not deserve one day tour.
So I changed my ticket and will return wednesday.
This is really very interesting city, I think I like it.
/life :: Link / Comments (0)
Sat, 08 Sep 2007
I have no words, just emotions.
Or short story about how I managed to walk in London.
Let me start from the beginning - I moved from Cambridge to meet with my friends
in London, but I had only UK postal code of the destination and cached google maps
and uk street maps pictures. The former with quite small resolution, i.e.
without any street names, but with undeground station name. So I moved to the needed
undeground station without any problems from King's Kross station, where
I arrived from Cambridge.
When I moved out of the station building I found that my phone battery is completely
discharged and I can not even turn phone on. So, first problems - I have no address,
only postal code, and have no phone access. I was quite in a bad mood, since I managed
to drop my camera today and it stopped to autofocus and make photos in automatic mode,
but, well, I have curvy hands, so stop about that.
Anyway, I arrived to the needed undeground station and moved into needed direction,
since I had roads on the map without names, I needed to select a distination intuitevly
and got azimuth for the needed direction. Because of absence of street names on my map,
I needed to make quite a big loop over main streets, but eventually I roughly was
in the needed area. Actually I did not know what to do next, but eventually found the street
for needed postal code. Street contained quite big number of houses, some of them are
multi-appartment. Initial idea was to start calling to every bell and ask for my friends,
but that was not a very good thing, so I started to talk with people on the street and asked
them to show me what house has given postal code. No one could reply actually, but then I found
Mike - a guy who asked me first about address, then after I said that I have only postal
code he asked a number to call, when I said that my phone is fully discharged I saw that he has
the same phone as mine, so I asked him to give me a battey, which he gladly agreed, so I called
my friends and got a house number. He did not get a beer though, but I was quite happy that there are
such people here. In russia, if anyone asks your phone then be ready he will run away with it.
It was quite fun journey.
I liked the whole summit - I saw very interesting people there, but could not actually
talk with them - I did not know anyone so could not break other's conversation. I glad I was there
and met those people. That was fun.
I'm about to drop my ticket back and return later - London is very interesting (although I like Cambridge
more).
Thanks, that is really good meeting.
/life :: Link / Comments (0)
Fri, 07 Sep 2007
Walking in Cambridge.
I've added set of Cambridge photos I made walking
with Oleg Nesterov, Kir Kolyshkin (OpenVZ) and Pavel Emelianov (OpenVZ)
in Cambridge after kernel summit.
This is really special city.
Enjoy.
/devel/other :: Link / Comments (0)
NetApp is a real crap.
I've just read about a suit
against Sun and ZFS about infrigment of WAFL and RAID patents.
Next one can be Oracle with btrfs and Linux in general because of RAID technology
included in the kernel.
How hypocrisy is Dave's NetApp blog after that, shame on you. I'm glad I declined to work
with them.
/devel/other :: Link / Comments (0)
Thu, 06 Sep 2007
Containers talk by Eric Biederman and Paul Menage.
Overall notes highlighted in this talk were overview
of the support in linux kernel, splitted into namespaces: network, uid, pid, ipc,
most of which is already completed and in the kernel, maybe except network, since
there is no David Miller's approval on the whole idea. Namespaces TODO list includes
additional features (time, dev and other virtual namespaces), isolation issues
for physical devices, consolem printks and so on.
Next control groups (task containers) were described: memory controller, i.e. limit
usage for virtual server, CPU usage limiting, cpusets, task freezer and various
per-container limits were noted. Another simple alternatives were shown
like rlimits and existing groupping tools (uid/pgrp and others),
and theirs limitations. Overhead of the containers was shown to be negligible,
but it is possible under some circumstances to trade performance for QoS
for some resource controllers. Control group TODO list include
virtual servr support and more tight integration with namespaces.
/devel/other :: Link / Comments (0)
Kernel scalability talk by Matt Mackall and Nick Piggin.
Lockless page cache patch and its complexity were highlighted,
SLAB/SLUB allocators were presented with short discussion
about performance of both (I failed to distinguish SLAB from SLUB
pronuncation, but one of them was blaimed as having worse performance,
likely it is SLUB, so Matt requested a more precise benchamrk results
and testing environment explaination). Number of cache issues and possible
solution from avoiding cache misses, moving data between CPUs,
MSI interrupt usage in network were shortly concerned by the audience.
There was a note from Christoph hellwig about need for faster block remapping
algo used in block layer and short discussion about extent/block based
remapping patches.
Problems with page flushing problems and possible ways to fix them
were highlighted next. Other issues concerned are larger page usage,
pago lock control from filesystems, extent based map, buffer head problems.
Scaling down to embedded world showed number of problems with
kernel size.
/devel/other :: Link / Comments (0)
Syslet/threadlet and realtime kernel talk from Ingo and Thomas.
Main idea beind -rt patchset is to make system more predictible, not
exactly faster in some environments, but more predictible.
Ingo highlighted that quite big part of his -rt kernel
patchset moved into the kernel already, and that some other
bits are pending. Number of features (like irq processing threads)
likely will not be moved into the kernel because of its very
special nature, although number of its positive sides
for existing kernel was highlighted.
Threadlets were shown as a AIO successor, since it is
much more easier to program than existing AIO models and
any other generic state machines. Its design, implementation,
usage cases and possible challenges and problematic places
were shortly described.
/devel/other :: Link / Comments (0)
Linux and enterprises.
First enterprise presentation was from DreamWorks.
They have more than 600 linux desktops and even higher number
of linux machines in the rendering farm. They run own application
both batching and iteractive and way how Linux memory management
works is not always the best one. Swapping was the main problematic
issue with short coverage of swap prefetch patches
(each time this words were said the whole audience exploded :).
Another issue is OOM condition and oom-killer, which usually kills
not what is supposed to be, but it is quite small problem comparing
to swap troubles.
The last problem discussed is NFS mounting and attributes issues,
discussion showed that problem is being solved and there are patches
flying around to fix the issue.
Next enterprise client was Credit Suisse bank.
This guys want to talk with kernel community directly, since work
with distros usually turns out to be completely unproductive.
Discussed issues include kernel scheduler, real-time linux (
it was showed that this patchset greatly improves theirs performance
without any special tuning), linux diagnostics (some kind
of SystemTap, uTRACE and other solutions), TCP/IP issues (Nagle
algorithm jitter, various new features of the protocol,
like quickacks and slowstart changes). Number of desired
features was highlighted related to linux networking like
message passing protocols, RDMA and tcp/ip
offloading usage, small performance tests of the different
technologies and NICs (with and without offloading features)
was shown. This rised quite unhealthy discussion with
pointing possible bugs in the presentation data, with
possibly unconfigured things on the testing side. It was shown
that having test setup handy will result in the immediate fix of
the problem, but having such testing environment is not always possible.
The last enterprise presentation was from Linux Foundation.
First virtualization was concerned with highlighted ideas
of sponsoring community developers and providing some kind
of management and workgroup for controlling the whole process
(which was pointed by audience as a worthless idea). Next issue
discussed was power management and so called 'green linux',
it was pointed that some areas are not yet fully covered like embedded
and servers, and fair amount of works needs to be done pushing hardware vendors.
Driver development presentation showed a desire to have open source drivers
(surprise), promoting NDA program to allow developers to have an access
to hardware, and some kind of business model to work with open source
drivers. Presentation briefly showed security issues (like encrypted
filesystems and usability of existing features like selinux),
scalability (NUMA features, FS and IO scalability isses were described),
kernel debugger (it was shown the possibility to sponsor
a developer to cleanup and submit KGDB), IPv6 (mostly requirements to
make a sertification and meet telco market). Testing projects
and efforts in automative process wre highlighted. ZFS easy administration
was shown as example of a good taste. SystemTap market readiness was shown,
but audience (especially Christoph Hellwig)
replied very cold - code is not even remotely in the mergeable form,
existense number of wrong design issues in DTrace and SystemTap was highlighted,
so essentially probability of its merge is quite low. The last issue discussed
is RDMA hooks and need for some kind of generic stack for this technology, which is
a bit frowned upon in the community because of it exists like a black box
without any ability to debug and fix bugs there.
/devel/other :: Link / Comments (0)
I had a short note about kernel development process.
And my view of the problem of the absence of
reviwers and feedback. My point is that when people,
which were put into copy list, do not provide any kind
feedback, this is just a disrespect for the developer.
To fix such hard demotivation I proposed an idea
of always answering mails, i.e. if someone is added to Cc:
list, then it have to reply. It can be different:
'I do not care, please drop me from copy list',
'I have not time for review', 'I do not like this because of ...',
'This sucks', 'I like it but' and so on. There is no need to answer
to every mail, just to show that you got the message,
understood idea (if wanted) and provided a feedback.
Absence of such feedback really demotivates developers,
and thus they will not provide a review for another work,
so we have a closed circle: core kernel hackers do not
provide feedback to other developers, which do not review
other's work.
Idea was met quite cold - no one likes to reply to mails
they do not care about, but I think people should start understanding,
that until they are changed itself and provide a feedback,
others will not move, and thus call from core developers
for more reviews is just a hypocrisy.
/devel/other :: Link / Comments (4)
Wed, 05 Sep 2007
Added KS photos.
Two albums - flight to the London and views from the plain,
and Linux kernel summit attendees - set of photos from
the meeting.
All are awailable in gallery.
/devel/other :: Link / Comments (0)
Everyone likes to create a new userspace API and generally
no one can make this really good (at least for the first turn).
Michel showed us how bad some errors in this area are and rised
a discussion about how the situation could be if not fixed, but
at least changed - he proposed to completely formalize userspace
API development. Discussion though turned into proposing different
ways of (automatic) testing.
/devel/other :: Link / Comments (0)
Bugs.
Andrew described how kernel bugzilla
is being used and what can be improved in the way
bug walks from original reporter to developer and eventual
fix and what problems rise on this way like bugs
which gets 'lost', i.e. when reporter does not return
back or can not proceed with testing, timing issues
in fixing bugs - if bug has not been fixed very quickly probability
of the successful resolve drops dramatically. Discussion
was rised about ways bugs are being fixed right now
with pointed problematic places and how a situatin
with unloved bugs and bad developers should be fixed.
Discussion then proceeded about review process and how
it can be improved further. One of the idea proposed
by Andrew is to introduce new 'Reviewed-by' tag for patches,
which will include a link for review so that
people could determine quality of the patch and thus
introduce some kind of virtual currency and make review process
more attractive, which was objected by Linus at least for small
patches.
/devel/other :: Link / Comments (0)
Kernel summit stated with brief introduction by Theodor Tso.
Then boring stuff took its place: Greg Kroah-Hartman started a discussion
about IP, distros all related things. People talked about shorter/longer releases,
about how will or will not entterprise customers and community happy with that, about tracking
regressions... A long and quite emotional discussion about API breaking
took place then. After passions were cooled down a bit, people talked about
new hardware, about getting drivers upstream and related to this process
problems. Switched to merge early motto and decided that even bad driver
in the tree is better than no driver at all (questionable from my
point of view).
/devel/other :: Link / Comments (1)
Next part is mini-conferences reports.
First one is power management report.
Found that suspend to ram kind of works for majrity of people,
but there are quite a lot of problems mostly in drivers.
Suspend to disk is a thing that everyone hates,
and second version (TuxOnIce) is out of the tree.
Drivers are blamed for all problems, like some network
cards (mostly wireless) can not be turned off or switched
into power-saving mode (like OLPC wireless card).
Next filesystem/storage report.
It was held to connect different filesystem/storage developers
together to understand how to have a progress in crossing areas
(like unionfs, which touchs underlying filesystem in different ways)
Number of new storage features (like
self-correcting code usage (if I understood that correctly)) and
object-based disks were briefly described.
VM talk touched memory fragmentation, allocation, caches and theirs
features (like shrinking). FS part contained generic delayed allocation
and its problems and short description of various features.
Containers and related problems were shortly introduced.
Virtualization minisummit report included brief status
of the different virtualization technologies existing today.
number of issues were described:
performance problem in the virtualized environment and ways
to deal with them, interfaces and access methods, different virtualization
mechanisms and theirs status and long way of merging virtualization
support into different distros.
This presentation was actually too technical, but still very interesting
(even modulo my understanding).
/devel/other :: Link / Comments (0)
Tue, 04 Sep 2007
A day was spent with fun.
After I found a hotel and managed to turn my EU electricity jacks
to UK sockets (I got the last adaptor in the nearest electricity shop)
I read how to find filesystem conference, but it was already too late, so I missed
the whole event.
Anyway, till dinner there was noting interesting, I tried some local beer,
walked around and generally slacked. Dinner was fun - after some bits
of food I opened a present - a liter of Nemiroff vodka and people started
to feel themself good. I believe about one quarter of attendees sat with
us and tried a russian present, but most of them usually ran away after that :)
Next time I will get two bottles.
After dinner I checked local pubs with Andi Kleen and his brother until late
night (where I saw a person with OpenSolaris t-shirt btw).
Ugh, and I had a small talk about how linux maintainers and big-name developers
suck when things come to patches from others and silence from
core people.
I tried to say to people, that such crowdy meeting likely will not and can not
end up in a good technical discussion, but eventually everyone dropped to it
and started to talk about Linux, about kernel and related stuff...
Anyway, that was really fun day. Let's see how first day of the conference will
go.
/devel/other :: Link / Comments (2)
I'm here.
I've seen already number of kernel hackers, although talked a bit
only with Matt Mackall, since we both failed to get keys (wrong hotel, now
everything is ok).
I found that I have terrible accent and people quite frequently can not understand me.
Usually after louder pronuncation things became clear.
The only known for me people I saw are David Miller and Alan Cox.
So far I only advised to drop all our scheduled conversations and play
football on the near field. No one replied yet.
/devel/other :: Link / Comments (1)
Mon, 03 Sep 2007
Linux Kernel Summit.
I'm about to leave Moscow in several hours and move to kernel summit.
I really do not know what to do there, but I think I will spent a good time there.
Have a nice time.
/devel/other :: Link / Comments (0)
Sun, 02 Sep 2007
Quotation of the week.
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Re: r.kernel.org
Your BSD software appears to have a bug in it. Your email's CC line was
truncated at "netdev@vge", with the rest spilling into your email's
subject line.
I'll wager this bug also triggered a buffer overflow on your side,
leading to an unwanted public spew of anti-Linux conspiracy theories.
/devel/other :: Link / Comments (2)
Sat, 01 Sep 2007
Memory defragmentation.
Christoph Lameter from SGI has posted
a patchset aimed to implement memory defragmentation in his SLUB
memory allocator.
Main idea of the new version is to find pages, which are in the slab, but are
not referenced, to free them and combine into bigger chunks (compound pages).
SLAB/SLUB/SLOB still does not support in-page defragmentation, which was one of the main
issues in my network (tree) allocator,
which combined any objects close to each other, so that allowed bigger allocations,
but not only pages into compound pages (which is can do too). Main feature
of the network allocator was the idea, that objects should never be freed on the
different CPU than where it was allocated. In SLAB this approach
is never used and objects can be freed on different than allocation CPUs which
leads to the fragmentation.
/devel/networking/nta :: Link / Comments (0)
|